February 21, 2010

Coming Out As an IHOP Skeptic

Updated, 3/14/10
I've added sources for some of the revivalists I mentioned to be false teachers.
Updated, 2/23/10: I was rightfully encouraged to include a source regarding my concerns with Bickle's using allegory to create new doctrine. I was reluctant to do so because the author of this source is anti-charismatic, and I am not. I didn't want any more offense thrown at IHOPpers than needed. So, read with discernment.
Still, as promised, working on sources for the revivalists I mentioned to be false.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
I have a confession. I am an IHOP skeptic, IHOP being the International House of Prayer in Kansas City. I am leery of its doctrines, its practices, and its history. Becoming somewhat familiar with the teachings of IHOP leader Mike Bickle, I feel pretty safe in my decision to stay away.

With shaky hands, a knot in my stomach, and very clumsy words, I explain my mistrust.

One of Bickle's more well known teachings is that of the Bridal Paradigm. Not by far the first person to interpret Song of Solomon as a description of the relationship between Jesus and His Bride, Bickle goes further to make it about Jesus and us individually. This is new revelation of the Bridal Paradigm is central at IHOP; it is imperative, they believe, for individual growth of Christians to understand their bridal identity.

The problem with this new revelation is that it is only found by allegorizing Scripture. No where in Scripture is there any implication that the Song of Solomon is about Jesus and His Bride, individually or corporately.

Bickle allegorizes again the parable of the 10 virgins in Matthew 25:1-13. Christians who have always read this literally understand that it is about being prepared for Christ's return- the 5 who were prepared 5 were His, the other 5 not prepared were not His- He didn't know them. Bickle assumes that all 10 were His.

He gives allegorical meaning to the lamps of the virgins- that they were all a functioning ministry. He gives allegorical meaning to the oil in the lamps, calling it "the heart connect with the Holy Spirit. As we cultivate our secret life in God, did you know that everyone one of us in this room have a secret life with God... It's the reach of your heart for God. Everyone of us are developing a secret history in God- that's the oil, the connection with the Holy Spirit," Bickle says in his audio message #2 given March 6, 2008. So the five virgins prepared were Christians who had a more intimate relationship with Christ, while the five virgins were Christians who didn't understand their 'bridal identity' or have as much intimacy with Christ.

This teaching gives way to pietism. The 'work' of intimacy is required to be a more elite Christian than other kinds of Christians. I have seen my friends who go to IHOP beat themselves up for not being 'intimate' enough- a work not even found in Scripture.

This idea of a 'reach of your heart for God' contrasts the God of the Bible Who reaches out His heart toward us. Intimacy is a natural result of having been forgiven of our sins, being freed from the yolk of the law, and being adopted heirs of the Father. Intimacy is a joy, a reward- not a work.

Bickle is of former Kansas City Prophet fame, men who were rebuked for and who repented of heretical doctrines. However the heretical doctrines of the KC prophets, specifically Joel's Army and The Latter Rain Movement, seem to heavily influence the teachings at IHOP. In his teaching from 2008, "Being Prepared to Fully Embrace the Move of the Holy Spirit", Bickle briefly discusses how "God releases grace for moves of God (small 'm') that work together to prepare the body of Christ for the great final global End Time Move of God (capital 'M') that surpasses the Book of Acts and results in Jesus' return".

Bickle in the teaching given March 6, 2008 says that:

We're not absent for the great tribulation, now listen carefully, the church causes the great tribulation. What I mean by that- it's the church, it's the praying church under Jesus' leadership that's loosing the judgment in the great tribulation in the way that Moses stretched forth his rod and prayed and loosed the judgements upon Pharaoh. The church in the tribulation is in the position that Moses was before Pharaoh but it won't be a Pharaoh and Egypt, it'll be the great end time Pharaoh called the antichrist and the book of Revelation is a book about the judgments of God on the antichrist loosed by the praying church.


The Latter Rain eschatology claims that a company of prophets and apostles will defeat Satan. Bickle claims the Church will, using a special type of prayer as the key. In both eschatologies, an elite end-time church defeats God's enemies and Jesus is 'held in the heavens' until it happens.

Bickle emphasizes in the March 6 teaching that the greatest revival lies ahead and will occur at the same time as the Great Tribulation. "There's so many principles in the [parable of the virgins] parable. It is an end time parable, I tell you it is. It is for the people and when the crisis and the revival of the great Matthew 24 is unfolding." "We're still in Matthew 24, it's all about the end times- Matthew 24 and then the three parables. Jesus is preparing the church through these three parables to walk in victory in the hour of the greatest revival in history and the greatest time of trouble in history- it's called the Great Tribulation."

Matthew 24 teaches no such thing- unless Scripture is allegorized. Now, the Latter Rain movement has a teaching about a Great End Times Revival that comes from allegorizing some Old Testament passages about the agricultural seasons in Israel. But Matthew 24 does not.

I am bothered by Bickle's end times teachings not because they are different than mine, but because they allegorize Scripture and arrogantly say that human beings have such a big part- that we somehow usher it through some special kind of praying.

Bickle describes his doctrine that Christians must adopt a certain version of prayer before Christ can return:

Right now the prayer movement is growing fast... really fast! But when I say it's growing fast instead of one percent of the Body of Christ taking hold of it, maybe 10 percent. It's... you know it's like 10 times bigger than it was a generation ago, but beloved, as fast as the prayer movement is growing, where people are getting hold of it, still for 90 percent of the Body of Christ, it's not even on their mind. Jesus is not coming until the Body of Christ globally is crying out, "Come Lord Jesus, Come Lord Jesus, Come Lord Jesus" and they don't just say "come and forgive me" they are crying out in the understanding of who they are as the one that is cherished by Jesus in the bridal identity.


So, in order for Christ to come, Christians must adopt Bickle's allegorical interpretation of the Song of Solomon and Matthew 25, and cry out "Come, Lord Jesus" in their bridal identity? This is a bold claim.

Christians have been praying for Christ's return ever since John penned "And the Spirit and the Bride say come" in the Book of Revelation. Christians proclaim the "Lord's death until He comes" every time we take communion (1 Corinthians 11:26) in faith as we wait for the marriage supper of the Lamb. Does Bickle really have the authority to claim that Christians have had an inadequate prayer life all this time until his revelation- a revelation for which there is no Scriptural support?

Because of his frequent allegorization of Scripture which brings out the elitist, legalist in myself, I cannot put myself under the teaching of Mr. Bickle. In addition, any confidence I had in Mr. Bickle's ability to discern, let alone to lead people in, a 'move' of God waned strongly after reading his teaching notes and listening to the previously linked audio of his teaching on being prepared to embrace a move of the Holy Spirit.

Bickle claims that there are obvious signs of the increasing move of the Holy Spirit in our nation, "strategic installments" of the move of God since Azusa in 1904, the Spirit 'flowing' in revival and 'ebbing' in His activity to give the body of Christ time to digest what He has imparted. Of course, Bickle fails to give any Scriptural evidence for such a claim of installments, ebbings and flowings. And, while, to his credit, Bickle gives much exhortation to use discernment, he fails to use it himself when it comes to past 'moves' of the Holy Spirit.

For instance, the examples Bickle gives of such 'moves' in this teaching are as follows:

John Alexander Dowie healing revival (1890’s); Wales revival (1904); Azusa Street revival (Los Angeles in 1906); John G. Lake healing revival (1910-30); Aimee Simple McPherson healing revival (1920’s); Voice of Healing revival with Oral Roberts, William Branham, Kenneth Hagin, etc. (1940-50’s); Charismatic Renewal with the Catholics then main line denominations (1967); Jesus Movement Chuck Smith/Lonnie Frisbee in Southern California (1970’s); Vineyard healing revival with John Wimber (1980’s); International renewal center in Lakeland Florida with Rodney Howard-Browne reaching Pentecostals (1993); International renewal center in Toronto with John Arnott reaching main line denominations (1994) in conjunction with the HTB renewal; Pasadena renewal center with Lou Engle and Che Ahn. The Pensacola revival with Steve Hill (1995); Regional renewal in Smithton with Steve Gray (1995); Regional healing revival in Redding with Bill Johnson (2000), Todd Bentley national healing revival in Lakeland (2008 ) and Rick Joyner with a regional healing revival.


How were these examples ‘moves of God’? Bickle doesn’t explain here. I'm assuming because there were reports of the kind of manifestations he examples to be the Spirit's manifestations he talks about here and here in the above paragraphs made regarding these ministries and revivals. However, consider these men behind the ministries and revivals.

John G Lake:

http://www.letusreason.org/Popteac40.htm
http://endtimespropheticwords.wordpress.com/2008/12/01/john-g-lake-exploits-and-exploitation/
William Branham:

Kenneth Hagin


http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/hagin/general.htm
http://www.forgottenword.org/hagin.html


Todd Bentley/Lakeland


http://www.worldmag.com/articles/15373
http://westernstandard.blogs.com/shotgun/2009/05/i-guess-that-if-you-die-and-go-to-heaven-thats-a-healing-of-sorts.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJD_7LLixz4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2Rw6TCiUO8&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhpFbjfmK6E&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AW2kaRP3EtI&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LJICxXnvlw&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bqJaJzHdGaI&feature=related

Let's say the miracles and so forth of the other above false teachers were real- difficult to prove all these years later- but let’s say that people really were healed of diseases and disabilities through their ministries and the 'manifest presence' of some sort of spirit really did show up in their meetings. The Bible speaks of false signs and wonders (Matthew 24: 23-25, Mark 13:21-23). Hebrews 2: 1-4 tells us that God bore witness to His salvation through signs and wonders. Signs and wonders are to point to something. In 2 Thessalonians 2:8-10, we see false signs and wonders pointing to the false christ, the lawless one.


If indeed the miracles and manifestations experienced through the ministry of these false teachers and preachers were real, who and what are they pointing to? They point to false teachings, false doctrines, and a false christ!


Bickle says, "God uses weak and broken vessels of clay so that no one glories or boasts in man" and that we are not mandated to point out what lacks excellence in each vessel, if they are minor, 'gnat-issues'. (Bickle takes Matthew 23:23-24- "You pay tithe of mint and anise... and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy. Blind guides, who strain out a gnat and swallow a camel!"- out of context, to mean that we are to swallow minor issues while concentrating on bigger 'camel' issues. Matthew 23:23-24 is about the hypocrisy of the Pharisees, not about discernment.


Paul says the same thing, that God uses the weak to shame the wise. Paul was a very weak man- but Paul did not teach false doctrine. Weak, broken vessels' does not mean 'false teachers'. Nor do weak, broken people stay weak. They grow in wisdom, understanding, and right doctrine. This did not happen with the men and women in Bickles above revival/ministry examples. Instead of growing in His Word, sanctification, and holiness, their doctrines grew worse and scandal followed their personal lives. God uses weak people- but He doesn't leave us weak!

"Love covers a multitude of sin (1 Peter 4:8)," Bickle reminds us regarding these broken vessels. But, love doesn't mean we excuse or ignore the sin. "I charge you in the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who is to judge the living and the dead, and by his appearing and his kingdom, preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. For the time is coming when people will not endure sound doctrine, but having itching ears, they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own passions, and will turn away from listening to the truth and will wander off into myths." 2 Timothy 4: 1-4

In this teaching, Mr. Bickle shares this infamous word he received in 1982: I will change the understanding and expression of Christianity in the earth in one generation. He then says 'changing the expression' speaks of the way the Church expresses its life together under the leadership of the Holy Spirit.


But, I ponder, the Bible gives clear directions for how the Church is to express its life together under the leadership of the Holy Spirit. What Scriptural evidence supports this word from God that the expression will change? How, Mr. Bickle, did you test it?

And what, Mr. Bickle, do you do with your prophets like this? Who prophetically dreams things that don't happen, who says that the prophetic is never a guarantee, but an invitation to join the Great Intercessor? Poor God. Wanted an end to abortion, apparently, but not enough people musta joined His Intercession. I didn't know we had that much power.

So, I do not trust Bickle's teachings nor his idea of what a move of the Spirit is. So, no attending the current Student Awakening- especially since phrases are being used reflecting the same kinds of doctrines proclaimed at Lakeland.

Oh, but the Spirit is manifesting. I'm sure some spirit is manifesting. I hope it is God's. But signs and wonders point so something. IHOP has false doctrines and teachings. Are they then pointing to a false christ?

But people are repenting. Awesome. Really- it is a good thing to repent. And I'm not surprised folks at IHOP are repenting. IHOP is very good at giving its students and visitors the law.

The videos I watched had the leaders calling the audience to repentance to receive refreshing, and so they could raise the dead, and cast out demons. Only very briefly was the cross mentioned, and it was not the emphasis.

The people from Westboro Baptist Church call people to repentance. When calling people to repentance, you must break them with the Law of God; IHOP, and Westboro, you've got it right. But, you must offer them the good news of the forgiveness of sins in Jesus name when you have broken them. This cross is for Christians, too. We can't be good for goodness sake even if we wanted to. Through forgiveness and walking in the Spirit we are enabled to 'be good'. Because we've a new heart. But since our righteousness doesn't count anyway, for when God looks at us, He sees the righteousness of Christ, shouldn't Christ and His cross be what is focused on at repentance?

So, these are my thoughts.

No comments: